The Disheartening Shift: The Inclusion of Lunchables in School Lunches

In recent developments, there has been a disconcerting change in the composition of school lunches, with the inclusion of Lunchables. These pre-packaged meals, while convenient for parents, pose several concerns in terms of nutrition, health implications, and the overall well-being of our children. This article aims to shed light on why the decision to provide Lunchables in school lunches is a detrimental one, backed by relevant evidence and expert opinions.

Three individuals in casual attire cycling together on a scenic road, enjoying a leisurely bike ride under the clear blue sky.

1. Lack of Nutritional Value:

Lunchables are notorious for their low nutritional value. These pre-packaged meals often contain highly-processed meats, cheeses, and crackers, alongside sugary desserts and processed snacks. They are typically high in sodium, unhealthy fats, and artificial additives. This limited nutritional content fails to meet the dietary needs of growing children, compromising their health and overall development.

2. Increased Health Risks:

The consumption of Lunchables can lead to numerous health risks, particularly in the long term. Excessive sodium intake can contribute to high blood pressure, putting children at risk for cardiovascular problems later in life. The high levels of unhealthy fats found in Lunchables can lead to weight gain, obesity, and related health issues such as diabetes and heart disease. By promoting such unhealthy food choices, we are jeopardizing the well-being of our children and undermining their future health.

3. Poor Eating Habits:

The introduction of Lunchables in school lunches perpetuates poor eating habits. By providing children with pre-packaged, processed meals, we discourage the consumption of fresh fruits, vegetables, and whole foods. This may impede their exposure to a balanced diet, limiting their understanding and appreciation for healthy food choices. Such habits established during childhood can persist into adulthood, perpetuating a cycle of poor nutrition and associated health problems.

4. Educational Responsibility:

Schools play a crucial role in educating students about healthy eating habits. However, the inclusion of Lunchables contradicts this responsibility. By offering highly processed, nutritionally deficient meals, we send a message that convenience trumps nutritional value, thereby failing to promote the importance of making informed dietary choices. Schools should prioritize providing nutritious meals that support students’ well-being and instill positive habits.

5. Alternative Solutions:

Rather than opting for Lunchables, schools should focus on providing well-rounded, nutritious meals that cater to children’s dietary needs. Collaborating with nutritionists and experts in child health, school lunch programs can develop menus that incorporate whole grains, lean proteins, fruits, and vegetables. This approach would ensure children receive the necessary nutrients for growth and development while promoting healthy eating habits.


1. Keast DR, Fulgoni VL, Nicklas TA, et al. Food sources of energy and nutrients among children in the United States: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2006. Nutrients. 2013;5(1):283-301.

2. Health Implications of Dietary Sodium Intake in Children. American Academy of Pediatrics.

3. Malik VS, Pan A, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98(4):1084-1102.

4. Ludwig DS, Peterson KE, Gortmaker SL. Relation between consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks and childhood obesity: a prospective, observational analysis. Lancet. 2001;357(9255):505-508.

Note: This article is for informational purposes only and does not substitute professional medical or nutritional advice.